Musical Instruments

There and back again

When coming across new information of substantive relevance to a post that is already online, I usually edit that material into it without separate announcement. If its topic is explored further in a later post, retrospective attention is called there to the revision, with summary details and a link to the modified text. The present post does a bit of both and then proceeds into new territory. I’m bundling these tasks here because they are particularly interrelated and to wrap up loose ends as the blogging year draws to a close.

The preparation of the preceding post entailed a general search for zither-related patents issued to the German musical instrument manufacturer Peter Renk. Those relevant to that post are detailed in it. An additional two patents necessitated significant changes to another post that had been available for a longer while. It is headed The Keyboard Autoharp and Gusli, and has been reworked to reflect the new documents.

The initial version traced a path between a US patent issued in 1888 for a variant form of the autoharp with a piano-type keyboard, and a further variant of that design which became a mainstay of the traditional Russian orchestra early in the 20th century. It is also widely encountered there in solo use and a variety of smaller ensembles. The cited post illustrates that breadth with several video demonstrations, adding another here.

Continue reading “There and back again”
Musical Instruments

Proximity and circumstance

One of the documents considered in the preceding post is a US trademark for the word Autoharp that Carl F. Zimmermann applied for in December 1892. This was just as he was finalizing the sale of his business with that instrument to Alfred Dolge. I posited that he might have done so as part of their transition agreement, perhaps in last-minute response to an imagined question asked by Dolge: “Are you telling me that you never trademarked the instrument at the heart of the operation I’m about to buy!?”

There was some urgency in wrapping up such details since the World’s Columbian Exposition (aka Chicago World’s Fair) was set to open on 5 May 1893. This was less than four months after Dolge formally incorporated the “C. F. Zimmermann Company of Dolgeville, New York” (28 January 1893). It was also long past the allocation of space to the US musical instrument industry in the exposition’s Liberal Arts Building.

The Official Guide treats the displayed musical instruments in a cursory manner but in-depth coverage is provided by the independently produced Musical Instruments at the World’s Columbian Exposition, edited by Frank D. Abbott and published in 1895. It includes a lengthy narrative about Dolge’s presence there, and the numerous awards that were given both directly to him and to other exhibitors whose products included the piano felt and soundboards for which he was renowned. He operated two booths, with the one emblazoned “Alfred Dolge & Son” befittingly grandiose.

Continue reading “Proximity and circumstance”
Musical Instruments

Inspirational events

The International Exhibition of Arts and Manufactures was held in Philadelphia in 1876, celebrating the centennial anniversary of the US Declaration of Independence. It was a massive undertaking and the Main Hall alone had more floor space than any other building then in the world. The accompanying documentation was prodigious, ranging from formal reports and directories, to independently prepared narratives.

The host city made an extensive, if not to say disproportionate, contribution to the US utilization of that space. A particularly detailed description of the event, Frank Leslie’s Illustrated Historical Register of the Centennial Exposition, 1876, (online here) says this about it:

A peculiar feature of this important portion of the Exhibition is the noticeable frequency with which one meets exhibits from Philadelphia houses…fully two-thirds of the best American exhibits are the result of the well-known energy and enterprise of Philadelphians…and whatever may explain the circumstance, there is no doubt that much energy is displayed.

Continue reading “Inspirational events”
Musical Instruments

Herbert John Haddan

The post before last made side-by-side comparisons of patents for “zither-like” musical instruments issued in Europe and the USA during the 1880s, attempting to clarify the priority of a few key innovations. The present text extends that discussion into the following decade from a slightly different perspective. It is centered on the role played by an unsung participant whose name provides the title above.

Herbert John Haddan (1838–1911) was a well reputed British patent agent who served inventors in many fields. His involvement with musical instruments began no later than 1877, when he obtained a British patent on behalf of an American violin designer, doing so again in 1879 for one located in Germany. He went on to represent instrument makers on both sides of a growing transatlantic competition in the development of chord bar devices of the type now primarily associated with the autoharp. There were signals, throughout, of his having understood the musical instrument industry beyond the legalities of obtaining patents.

Before delving into specifics, a few general observations about the patenting process may be helpful. They are issued by national authorities and acquiring one in a given country confers no protection in any other. An inventor wanting international coverage needs a separate patent in each country where protection is sought. Legislation and procedures vary from country to country and time to time, as does the scope of a patent.

Continue reading “Herbert John Haddan”
Musical Instruments

The Two Gentlemen of Vogtland

This post revisits documents that have been discussed previously in several venues. It adds lesser known material in a summarized chronology of the innovative activity of the instrument makers named below. The intention is to clarify residual uncertainty about the priority of their respective contributions to the development of mechanized chord zithers.

Carl Friedrich Zimmermann was born in 1817 in Morgonröthe, Germany, a village in the district of Vogtland. It is 20 km on a straight line from Markneukirchen — an epicenter of the German musical instrument industry, also in Vogtland — where the five years younger Karl August Gütter lived and worked. Zimmermann was a renowned accordion and concertina maker who emigrated to the USA in 1864, where he continued his involvement with that craft.

Continue reading “The Two Gentlemen of Vogtland”
Musical Instruments

The autoharp takes wing

The preceding post traced the development of the colorfully named pig’s head psaltery from the 13th century through its mechanization near the end of the 19th century by the addition of damper bars. I promised to retell the same tale in a follow-up post — this one — focused entirely on its wing-shaped cousin. Beginning with a quick reminding look at a pig’s head psaltery, here is a typical representation in a sculpture on the 15th-century portal of the Saint Pierre Cathedral in Saintes, France.

This design appears to have been split down the middle in a comparable statuette on a late-14th-century gravesite monument in La Chaise-Dieu, France. The photo was taken at an angle from below and does not show the proportionality of the instrument’s sides as a frontal view would.

Continue reading “The autoharp takes wing”
Musical Instruments

A pig-headed approach to the autoharp

The following image comes from a mid-15th-century panel painting attributed to the workshop of Jan van Eyck. I’m aware of the pitfalls of assessing pictorial representations of musical instruments and might question a few details of the lute seen here. The psaltery and harp appear to be quite credible.

The bass strings of the psaltery are placed closest to the body of the player, who holds a quill in each hand. The right one is positioned to move across the entire stringbed, while the left one is centered on the bass strings. This asymmetrical design is termed a “wing shape.”

Continue reading “A pig-headed approach to the autoharp”
Looped Fabric

Scottish crochet in 1567

The word “crochet” designates both a tool with a hooked tip and a family of looped structures made with that tool. It additionally names the craft of producing fabric consisting of those structures, the fabric itself, and the objects into which it is worked. Each sense of the term has its own history and its appearance in an older text does not in itself indicate either a technique or a craft, even if the topic clearly relates to fabric production. Care is therefore needed to avoid conflating usage at one time and place with that of another.

The modern form of the craft can be traced back to the early 1800s and is commonly referred to simply as crochet. It didn’t initially span the full range of structural detail and techniques that were to develop (with a few also dropped along the way) but the aggregate has borne the name in English-language publication since the late 1830s. Nonetheless, its most basic structures — chains and the slip stitch — are verifiably older. Their position on the timeline of hook-based loopcraft has been indicated in various ways.

Continue reading “Scottish crochet in 1567”
Looped Fabric

New article on the history of the slip stitch

I am pleased to announce the publication of the article “Three objects catalogued as vantsöm in the collections of the Museum der Kulturen in Basel, Switzerland,” in the Archaeological Textiles Review No. 64 (2022).

It was coauthored with my friend Anne Marie Decker after a joint visit to the museum to examine the described material. Anne has made a corresponding announcement of the publication on her own blog, Nalbound. The complete ATR volume in which the article appears is freely available for downloading here, and this blog’s document repository includes an offprint. Here is the abstract:

The looped structure termed a slip stitch in the craft glossary of crochet can be produced both with a hook and an eyed needle. These implements are not equally amenable to working that structure into complex constructs such as the toe and heel of a sock. This article describes the examination of three objects that have been misidentified as nalbinding. Two of them are certain to have been crocheted and the third is highly likely also to represent that technique. The provenance of the objects is recorded as “Coptic Egyptian” on anecdotal evidence and without ascription of specific dates. If scientific dating were to establish that any of them approaches even the youngest age this might imply, the accepted date for the advent of crochet would require major revision.

Musical Instruments

Fifes and pastoral pipes in 1862

An earlier post examined evidence of the fife and flageolet interchangeably occupying the same niche in the accompaniment of dance in late-16th-century France. The fife was otherwise more clearly associated with military music, leading to a question about whether it had a more prominent role in civilian contexts than is generally recognized. Evidence of that being the case toward the end of the 18th century is provided by published compilations of Irish and Scottish dance tunes that explicitly list the fife as one of the instruments to which they are suited.

An etching from the mid-19th century presented below illustrates it in a manner that bolsters the notion of the fife having filled the musical role now commonly played by the tin whistle. (The flute is named as a separate instrument in the referenced compilations.)

Continue reading “Fifes and pastoral pipes in 1862”