Previous posts have examined the history of the autoharp in a number of musical, technological, and mercantile regards. The present post shifts that discussion into the overarching concern with how such history is written — “historiography.” This spans from the methodology and tools of academic research, to how the message resulting from their application is framed and conveyed.
Scholarly concern with the origin of the autoharp can be traced back to a monograph about the development of the concert zither, published in 1896 in Austria. It was written by the eminent German music critic and historian Julius Emil Gläsmer (under the pseudonym Hans Kennedy) with the title, Die Zither in der Vergangenheit, Gegenwart und Zukunft (The Zither in the Past, Present, and Future). Gläsmer was the reigning authority on that subject, and presented the autoharp as an utter debasement of the concert zither, invented in Germany in 1884. He made no mention of the younger instrument’s appearance in any other country.
A colloquial comparison of the autoharp with the concert zither appeared in the British daily press four years prior to that book. Examining Gläsmer’s work from a historiographic perspective, it would be reasonable to consider if he was aware of such earlier statements but excluded them from his narrative for some reason that might be worth further exploration. Either way, the newspaper commentary made an opposite assessment of the autoharp’s merits, and asserted that it found its way to Germany from the US. The following passage comes from a supplement to the 13 August 1892 issue of The Newcastle Weekly Chronicle.
Continue reading “Autoharp historiography”

